Bad Interview Moments Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by El Pollito » Sun Aug 20, 2017 10:40 am

yeah i mean it's a weird question or joke or whatever but welcome to law firms, a lot of your coworkers are going to be complete freaks. i would have been with anon but for the follow up post on how firms should drop to their knees to hire him/her.
Last edited by El Pollito on Sat Jan 27, 2018 2:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Carlton_Banks

New
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 5:25 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Carlton_Banks » Sun Aug 20, 2017 10:45 am

A. Nony Mouse wrote: There's a difference between thinking it's a stupid interview question and getting personally offended.
What about being personally offended by being asked a stupid question? I guess that's the issue here.

Bach-City

Bronze
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:00 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Bach-City » Sun Aug 20, 2017 10:46 am

.
Last edited by Bach-City on Sun Aug 27, 2017 11:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
cavalier1138

Moderator
Posts: 8007
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by cavalier1138 » Sun Aug 20, 2017 10:47 am

Carlton_Banks wrote:
A. Nony Mouse wrote: There's a difference between thinking it's a stupid interview question and getting personally offended.
What about being personally offended by being asked a stupid question? I guess that's the issue here.
I dunno. If the stupid question was "What do you think the Colonel's secret recipe is," then I wouldn't understand getting personally offended. If the stupid question involves deciding a hypothetical where you commit genocide, then it seems like it touches a more personal nerve, doesn't it?

notgreat

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:24 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by notgreat » Sun Aug 20, 2017 10:52 am

I think all of this misses the point. If you ask that question you are probably a weird freak. And saying that it is a totally normal and acceptable way to weed people out is also weird. Of course it is acceptable. It is big law, whatever the rainmakers want is acceptable. That is irrelevant. But it is not NORMAL at all to use that to weed people out. It means you are a freak.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Carlton_Banks

New
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 5:25 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Carlton_Banks » Sun Aug 20, 2017 10:59 am

cavalier1138 wrote:
I dunno. If the stupid question was "What do you think the Colonel's secret recipe is," then I wouldn't understand getting personally offended. If the stupid question involves deciding a hypothetical where you commit genocide, then it seems like it touches a more personal nerve, doesn't it?
Ok, well now you and Nony are taking me round the merry-go-round. Nony is arguing that the question wasn't offensive, just stupid - you quoted my response to that, and continue to assert that the question is both stupid and offensive.

I'm not sure how a hypothetical on genocide should be any more personal than a hypothetical like the Trolley Problem? And if I was asked that in an interview, I wouldn't be offended in the least, if only because it's exactly that: a hypothetical. The interviewer is not throwing me the keys to the Enola Gay, nor is he or she placing my hand on an actual railroad switch. Lighten up, and see it as the thinking exercise that all hypotheticals are.

flashdril

New
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 12:50 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by flashdril » Sun Aug 20, 2017 11:37 am

Carlton_Banks wrote:
cavalier1138 wrote:
I dunno. If the stupid question was "What do you think the Colonel's secret recipe is," then I wouldn't understand getting personally offended. If the stupid question involves deciding a hypothetical where you commit genocide, then it seems like it touches a more personal nerve, doesn't it?
Ok, well now you and Nony are taking me round the merry-go-round. Nony is arguing that the question wasn't offensive, just stupid - you quoted my response to that, and continue to assert that the question is both stupid and offensive.

I'm not sure how a hypothetical on genocide should be any more personal than a hypothetical like the Trolley Problem? And if I was asked that in an interview, I wouldn't be offended in the least, if only because it's exactly that: a hypothetical. The interviewer is not throwing me the keys to the Enola Gay, nor is he or she placing my hand on an actual railroad switch. Lighten up, and see it as the thinking exercise that all hypotheticals are.
It's absolutely both.

A few people here apparently feel that anyone who thinks the question is bad is a "snowflake." (The choice to actively use that term is as indicative as hell.) The question can be offensive without someone being "triggered" or needing a "safe space" or suffering psychological damage. It can be just a bad, dumb, offensive question.

Hypotheticals aren't inherently inoffensive. What if your resume stated "I own four dogs," and the associate said "You have to put one of them down, pick one?" Or if you were a parent, and he asked you to pick a child you had to kill. I think everyone would agree that would be sociopathic. There's a point at which these hypotheticals cross the line. For normal people, asking them to justify killing millions of people might cross a line. Because that's what the question is at the end of the day: what minor affront did you suffer while visiting this country which you can use to justify killing everyone who lives in that country?

What is he hoping to glean? What law-firm-useful skill does such an exercise promote? Is it important for lawyers to have in their heads at all time a constant, ever-shifting power-ranking of places they'd like to nuke? What would even be a good answer?

If I was asked this question in an interview my answer would absolutely be "none of them."

User avatar
cavalier1138

Moderator
Posts: 8007
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by cavalier1138 » Sun Aug 20, 2017 11:39 am

Carlton_Banks wrote:
cavalier1138 wrote:
I dunno. If the stupid question was "What do you think the Colonel's secret recipe is," then I wouldn't understand getting personally offended. If the stupid question involves deciding a hypothetical where you commit genocide, then it seems like it touches a more personal nerve, doesn't it?
Ok, well now you and Nony are taking me round the merry-go-round. Nony is arguing that the question wasn't offensive, just stupid - you quoted my response to that, and continue to assert that the question is both stupid and offensive.

I'm not sure how a hypothetical on genocide should be any more personal than a hypothetical like the Trolley Problem? And if I was asked that in an interview, I wouldn't be offended in the least, if only because it's exactly that: a hypothetical. The interviewer is not throwing me the keys to the Enola Gay, nor is he or she placing my hand on an actual railroad switch. Lighten up, and see it as the thinking exercise that all hypotheticals are.
Not really going in circles here. You jumped from whether the question was stupid to the question of whether people should be "personally offended" by stupid questions. I simply replied to that point, because I think it's ridiculous to imply that you can't see why someone would be offended by some stupid questions and not by others.

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2479
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Sun Aug 20, 2017 1:39 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:A significant portion of interviewing is acting like you get along with people who in reality horrify you.

If you decide that's the time to take your moral stance, go ahead and play with that fire. If I didn't have an offer and the interviewer said the Tutsis and the Armenians had it coming, I'd smile and nod.
Anon above. This was at a t-10 law school where firms are dying to hire you if you have a half decent gpa and can speak like a normal person. Again, I wasn't offended. Just thought it was an odd question to start off an interview where you're competing against other elite law firms for candidates. Maybe he only asked it to me because he had a weird vibe coming in or something. Just thought it was strange.
Oh, you don't know how law firm hiring works. Bless your heart, you thoroughly replaceable interviewee.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2479
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Sun Aug 20, 2017 1:52 pm

cavalier1138 wrote:
Bach-City wrote:At the end of the day you really did that firm a favor. I wouldn't want to work a long week with a snowflake who takes offense so easily. If I ever do interviews I might ask the same question to weed out the wusses.
Yeah! Testosterone fighting guns nukes football manliness!

Do I fit in? Can I work across from you?
This is something like the fourth time in the thread that you've failed to grasp that the important thing is not to be totally okay with your interviewer's question, but rather to manage to continue to be personable even when you hate what people are saying.

Or whatever, blow a gasket every time a partner says something off-color for a few years; let me know where it gets you.

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Sun Aug 20, 2017 1:56 pm

I get your point, but there's a big difference between "blowing a gasket every time a partner says something off-color for a few years," and coming into a thread dedicated to stupid things said at interviews and giving an example of something stupid said at an interview. I don't get where everyone thinks the person who posted about this is blowing a gasket, or wasn't personable at the time of the interview regardless.

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2479
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Sun Aug 20, 2017 2:20 pm

A. Nony Mouse wrote:I get your point, but there's a big difference between "blowing a gasket every time a partner says something off-color for a few years," and coming into a thread dedicated to stupid things said at interviews and giving an example of something stupid said at an interview. I don't get where everyone thinks the person who posted about this is blowing a gasket, or wasn't personable at the time of the interview regardless.
I could quote back all the answers that suggested the poster probably did not, in fact, roll with the punches, but how about I just call it a hunch?

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Sun Aug 20, 2017 2:30 pm

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
A. Nony Mouse wrote:I get your point, but there's a big difference between "blowing a gasket every time a partner says something off-color for a few years," and coming into a thread dedicated to stupid things said at interviews and giving an example of something stupid said at an interview. I don't get where everyone thinks the person who posted about this is blowing a gasket, or wasn't personable at the time of the interview regardless.
I could quote back all the answers that suggested the poster probably did not, in fact, roll with the punches, but how about I just call it a hunch?
Or assumption works too.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 20, 2017 2:33 pm

I brought up death.

The interviewer was talking about this mountain I grew up near that is a very grueling and dangerous hike. He mentioned his wife didn't want him to do it anymore and without thinking I agreed that it was dangerous and noted that I had a cousin who died while hiking it (snow shoeing during the winter). Have not received a CB and do not anticipate one lol

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 20, 2017 3:16 pm

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:

Oh, you don't know how law firm hiring works. Bless your heart, you thoroughly replaceable interviewee.
For the OP (based on his/her post) and for many at top schools the law firms are also thoroughly replaceable and interchangeable. No need to grovel before one that asks dumb questions. Move onto the next.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 20, 2017 3:41 pm

I walk into partner's room and he has a lot of memorabilia from a certain film franchise which I am a huge fan of and which was a big part of my life growing up. Interview goes really well for majority of interview and then he asks "What's the most interesting thing about you not on your resume?"

I totally blank - it's one of those obvious interview questions but I hadn't really been getting many of those (this was my 4th callback after 15 screeners or so and it was the first time I got the question). But all the stuff in the room about this film franchise reminded me of my childhood and my family, and desperate, grabbing for an answer, I apologized for what I was about to say and then said, "My dad died a couple years ago. I just thought about it because of all the [MOVIE] stuff in this room and he and I used to watch those movies together all the time. He told me I was named after [character from movie]. So yeah, that had a big impact on me, really trying to live up to his memory." or something like that.

lmao

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 20, 2017 3:51 pm

Interviewer "Name one non-legal skill that you are really good at and that's not listed on your resume." I mentioned I'm an amateur photographer. He wanted to see some sample of my work. So in the middle of my interview, I had to fish out my phone, open my Instagram page to show him some samples. Luckily, I don't post any personal pictures on Instagram.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


ghostoftraynor

Bronze
Posts: 305
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:43 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by ghostoftraynor » Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:38 pm

flashdril wrote:
Carlton_Banks wrote:
cavalier1138 wrote:
I dunno. If the stupid question was "What do you think the Colonel's secret recipe is," then I wouldn't understand getting personally offended. If the stupid question involves deciding a hypothetical where you commit genocide, then it seems like it touches a more personal nerve, doesn't it?
Ok, well now you and Nony are taking me round the merry-go-round. Nony is arguing that the question wasn't offensive, just stupid - you quoted my response to that, and continue to assert that the question is both stupid and offensive.

I'm not sure how a hypothetical on genocide should be any more personal than a hypothetical like the Trolley Problem? And if I was asked that in an interview, I wouldn't be offended in the least, if only because it's exactly that: a hypothetical. The interviewer is not throwing me the keys to the Enola Gay, nor is he or she placing my hand on an actual railroad switch. Lighten up, and see it as the thinking exercise that all hypotheticals are.
It's absolutely both.

A few people here apparently feel that anyone who thinks the question is bad is a "snowflake." (The choice to actively use that term is as indicative as hell.) The question can be offensive without someone being "triggered" or needing a "safe space" or suffering psychological damage. It can be just a bad, dumb, offensive question.

Hypotheticals aren't inherently inoffensive. What if your resume stated "I own four dogs," and the associate said "You have to put one of them down, pick one?" Or if you were a parent, and he asked you to pick a child you had to kill. I think everyone would agree that would be sociopathic. There's a point at which these hypotheticals cross the line. For normal people, asking them to justify killing millions of people might cross a line. Because that's what the question is at the end of the day: what minor affront did you suffer while visiting this country which you can use to justify killing everyone who lives in that country?

What is he hoping to glean? What law-firm-useful skill does such an exercise promote? Is it important for lawyers to have in their heads at all time a constant, ever-shifting power-ranking of places they'd like to nuke? What would even be a good answer?

If I was asked this question in an interview my answer would absolutely be "none of them."
I actually may use this question for an interview tomorrow. At first I thought it was dumb, but it seems like it would be a great way to sort out the people I have no desire to work with.

Also, lol "T-10." That doesn't exist.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:54 pm

How bad a faux pas to say "dude" in an interview with an associate? Just kind of slipped out while I was bemoaning a hobby.

lawdawg4

New
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2016 4:00 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by lawdawg4 » Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:55 pm

Anonymous User wrote:How bad a faux pas to say "dude" in an interview with an associate? Just kind of slipped out while I was bemoaning a hobby.
arguably not as bad as saying "sheeeeeee-it" when asked if you enjoy hiking

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:57 pm

lawdawg4 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:How bad a faux pas to say "dude" in an interview with an associate? Just kind of slipped out while I was bemoaning a hobby.
arguably not as bad as saying "sheeeeeee-it" when asked if you enjoy hiking
Just kind of felt unprofessional at the time.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 20, 2017 8:04 pm

ghostoftraynor wrote:
flashdril wrote:
Carlton_Banks wrote:
cavalier1138 wrote:
I dunno. If the stupid question was "What do you think the Colonel's secret recipe is," then I wouldn't understand getting personally offended. If the stupid question involves deciding a hypothetical where you commit genocide, then it seems like it touches a more personal nerve, doesn't it?
Ok, well now you and Nony are taking me round the merry-go-round. Nony is arguing that the question wasn't offensive, just stupid - you quoted my response to that, and continue to assert that the question is both stupid and offensive.

I'm not sure how a hypothetical on genocide should be any more personal than a hypothetical like the Trolley Problem? And if I was asked that in an interview, I wouldn't be offended in the least, if only because it's exactly that: a hypothetical. The interviewer is not throwing me the keys to the Enola Gay, nor is he or she placing my hand on an actual railroad switch. Lighten up, and see it as the thinking exercise that all hypotheticals are.
It's absolutely both.

A few people here apparently feel that anyone who thinks the question is bad is a "snowflake." (The choice to actively use that term is as indicative as hell.) The question can be offensive without someone being "triggered" or needing a "safe space" or suffering psychological damage. It can be just a bad, dumb, offensive question.

Hypotheticals aren't inherently inoffensive. What if your resume stated "I own four dogs," and the associate said "You have to put one of them down, pick one?" Or if you were a parent, and he asked you to pick a child you had to kill. I think everyone would agree that would be sociopathic. There's a point at which these hypotheticals cross the line. For normal people, asking them to justify killing millions of people might cross a line. Because that's what the question is at the end of the day: what minor affront did you suffer while visiting this country which you can use to justify killing everyone who lives in that country?

What is he hoping to glean? What law-firm-useful skill does such an exercise promote? Is it important for lawyers to have in their heads at all time a constant, ever-shifting power-ranking of places they'd like to nuke? What would even be a good answer?

If I was asked this question in an interview my answer would absolutely be "none of them."
I actually may use this question for an interview tomorrow. At first I thought it was dumb, but it seems like it would be a great way to sort out the people I have no desire to work with.

Also, lol "T-10." That doesn't exist.
Not the OP anon so I don't care if you make fun of them about the "T-10" thing, but congratulations on being in a position to interview people and still somehow having the emotional sophistication of a 14 year old 4chan poster being edgy for the sake of being edgy.

edit: accidentally clicked anon

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 20, 2017 8:06 pm

Due to a miscommunication with a firm, I was accidentally sent to the wrong office to interview. I did a screener for one office, but was instead sent to their main office for a CB. I just assumed their hiring decisions were all made out of the HQ, since it was a boutique where the hiring partner is in that office and the other offices are relatively small. So when I sit down with the recruiting coordinator, they started off telling me in-depth about their summer program and all of the opportunities available to summers. At the end, she asked if I had any questions. I responded, "I'm not sure if this matters, but I was originally screened for [insert other office], so will this impact anything?" They looked at me with a bit of panic, tried to translate what my experience would be like in that office, shuffled some things, and told me they were going to send off a quick email to my interviewers letting them know I was actually screened for the other office, but she still thought it best for me to go through with the interviews. I had pleasant conversations with all of the interviewers about the firm, etc., and they treated like it was an actual interview, but it was pretty clear they were confused why I was sitting across from them.

User avatar
El Pollito

Diamond
Posts: 20139
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by El Pollito » Sun Aug 20, 2017 8:30 pm

Anonymous User wrote:How bad a faux pas to say "dude" in an interview with an associate? Just kind of slipped out while I was bemoaning a hobby.
should be nbd if it was an otherwise fine interview
Last edited by El Pollito on Sat Jan 27, 2018 2:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428122
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Bad Interview Moments

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 20, 2017 8:33 pm

El Pollito wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:How bad a faux pas to say "dude" in an interview with an associate? Just kind of slipped out while I was bemoaning a hobby.
should be nbd if it was an otherwise fine interview
Yeah I caught it and apologized. Still feels like a blemish on an otherwise very good series of 4 interviews.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”