Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:39 pm

Anyone have info for Jenner Chicago?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:44 pm

Finnegan (DC)?
foley hoag (Boston)?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:47 pm

Sheppard Mullin NY?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:50 pm

King & Spalding -New York???

ResIpsa21

Bronze
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:46 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by ResIpsa21 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:53 pm

This thread has officially turned into a post-by-post request of numbers for every single major law firm in the country... why not just post the entire CLS datasheet and be done with it?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Aug 19, 2011 4:00 pm

ResIpsa21 wrote:This thread has officially turned into a post-by-post request of numbers for every single major law firm in the country... why not just post the entire CLS datasheet and be done with it?
To be fair, the thread title sort of led it in that direction. Posting the spreadsheet would be awesome, though. If not, further requests that I don't think have been covered:

Cravath
W&C
WLRK
STB (NY)
Boies (NY)
Kasowitz (NY)

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:52 pm

Would love K&E NY. Thanks, OP/other anon CLS angels.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:59 pm

Anonymous User wrote: To be fair, the thread title sort of led it in that direction. Posting the spreadsheet would be awesome, though. If not, further requests that I don't think have been covered:

Cravath
W&C
WLRK
STB (NY)
Boies (NY)
Kasowitz (NY)
Cravath - ~60%
W&C - 25%, but small sample size
WLRK - ~40%, smallish sample size
STB (NY) - ~60%
Boies (NY) - ~33%
Kasowitz (NY) - 60%, small sample size

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:00 am

Anonymous User wrote:Would love K&E NY. Thanks, OP/other anon CLS angels.
~60%

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:01 am

Anonymous User wrote:Cahill or Cadwalader?
~50% and ~66%

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:02 am

Thanks for doing this man, can you check Quinn NY?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:03 am

Anonymous User wrote:Anyone have info for Jenner Chicago?
No
Anonymous User wrote:Finnegan (DC)?
Foley Hoag (Boston)?
No to Finnegan, at Foley the sample is so small as to be basically meaningless.
Anonymous User wrote:Sheppard Mullin NY?
Too small a sample.
Anonymous User wrote:King & Spalding -New York???
No data.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:03 am

Anonymous User wrote:Thanks for doing this man, can you check Quinn NY?
~80%

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:04 am

May not be likely, but anything for Wilson Sonsini in Palo Alto?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:05 am

Anonymous User wrote:May not be likely, but anything for Wilson Sonsini in Palo Alto?
80% in Palo Alto, in NY sample size is too small to tell.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 12:11 am

Valuable public service. Thanks.

Any chance you got info on:

Kirkland (SF)
Quinn (SF)
Jones Day (SF)
MoFo (Palo Alto

???????

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 1:16 am

thanks!!!
how about Linklaters and Pillsbury NY?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 2:06 am

Freshfields?

Bingham Boston?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 2:15 am

Milbank?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 2:20 am

MBHB?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:44 am

We already had Dechert NY earlier in the thread... how about Dechert DC?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 8:11 am

Thank very much for posting this. Any chance you could post Sidley NY?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 8:52 am

What about Munger? Boies?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 10:04 am

Guys just a warning, the only data that can give exact percentages is from either CLS or HLS. From what I've seen, the % data for these two schools don't always translates to other schools. (For example, I saw someone saying it was around 30% cb -> offer from what he had heard at his school while for CLS it might be around 50%. Also there can possibly be differences b/w CLS and HLS too.)

Anyways its good for getting a rough estimate, just don't blindly rely on it.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428551
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Relative CB:Offer Ratios of Firms

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 22, 2011 10:07 am

^Poster Above. With the given caveat, here's what I have:

Freshfields: 60%
Milbank: 40%
Linklaters: 100% (Small Data Sample/ Probably School Influenced)
Sidley: 60%
Pillsbury: 65%

These are all for NY

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”