Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home
Law School
Admissions
Law
Schools
Law
Students
TLS
Forums
 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     Forum Archives     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats

TLS would like to remind its users that it is unlawful to share or distribute copies of copyrighted materials. Click here for copyright infringement notification information.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Forum rules


Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.



Post new topic Anonymous post new topic Reply to topic Anonymous reply to topic   [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:26 am
Posts: 99
Have law firms/associates been switching over to Westlaw Next very much (for those that used Westlaw)? How useful has it been? It seems like an interesting system, but I didn't want to start working with/get used to it if folks don't like it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 2:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Posts: 130366
I'm also curious about this. Westlaw Next is ridiculously good but I have no idea how costly it might be. Are firms/courts using it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:28 am
Posts: 270
My firm uses it...and life is good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 2:47 pm
Posts: 289
I had dinner last night with a friend who is a partner at a ~15 attorney firm in a small, not even close to secondary market, and they are using it. FWIW.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 3:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:57 am
Posts: 1451
Mine ditched WL as of Jan 1.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:26 am
Posts: 99
LawSchoolWannaBe wrote:
Mine ditched WL as of Jan 1.

Why? To save money by only using Lexis, I guess?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 5:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:57 am
Posts: 1451
jchoggan wrote:
LawSchoolWannaBe wrote:
Mine ditched WL as of Jan 1.

Why? To save money by only using Lexis, I guess?


I believe so. Lexis has better patent tools. Lexis discount was 2x as much as WL. Stuff like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:42 pm
Posts: 551
Westlaw next is crazy expensive. Westlaw is telling law schools they have to teach it because all the firms are using AND telling firms they have to subscribe because that's what law students (future associates) are learning. This little two-step is now out in the open and both schools and firms are unhappy about it. Plus, firms are realizing it is only marginally more useful than Google, but is much more expensive.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 1315
thrillhouse wrote:
Westlaw next is crazy expensive. Westlaw is telling law schools they have to teach it because all the firms are using AND telling firms they have to subscribe because that's what law students (future associates) are learning. This little two-step is now out in the open and both schools and firms are unhappy about it. Plus, firms are realizing it is only marginally more useful than Google, but is much more expensive.


Could you break down just how it ends up being more expensive than old WL?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:42 pm
Posts: 551
quakeroats wrote:
thrillhouse wrote:
Westlaw next is crazy expensive. Westlaw is telling law schools they have to teach it because all the firms are using AND telling firms they have to subscribe because that's what law students (future associates) are learning. This little two-step is now out in the open and both schools and firms are unhappy about it. Plus, firms are realizing it is only marginally more useful than Google, but is much more expensive.


Could you break down just how it ends up being more expensive than old WL?


It's hard to know how much anything costs with Westlaw. They have a menu, but those prices are rarely if ever, actually paid. Firms negotiate their own contracts with WL.

So, unfortunately, I can't say how much more expensive it is. I can only relay what has been relayed to me by university and firm law librarians.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:58 pm
Posts: 1389
thrillhouse wrote:
Westlaw next is crazy expensive. Westlaw is telling law schools they have to teach it because all the firms are using AND telling firms they have to subscribe because that's what law students (future associates) are learning. This little two-step is now out in the open and both schools and firms are unhappy about it. Plus, firms are realizing it is only marginally more useful than Google, but is much more expensive.


On the plus side, students get free pizza and backpacks if they go to training sessions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:42 pm
Posts: 551
NoleinNY wrote:
thrillhouse wrote:
Westlaw next is crazy expensive. Westlaw is telling law schools they have to teach it because all the firms are using AND telling firms they have to subscribe because that's what law students (future associates) are learning. This little two-step is now out in the open and both schools and firms are unhappy about it. Plus, firms are realizing it is only marginally more useful than Google, but is much more expensive.


On the plus side, students get free pizza and backpacks if they go to training sessions.


Amen to that! Free points, too!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 12:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:18 am
Posts: 224
I really wished I had Westlaw Next 1L year!! It's money.
I was always a Lexis person, but tried out Westlaw Next and now am converted. Too bad Westlaw has crappy points compared to Lexis which has better stuff and cheaper.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:41 pm
Posts: 3690
So I just negotiated a new deal for my firm for Westlaw Next. We got a great deal on it (we were coming back to Westlaw from Lexis). Anyone using it? Any cool features I should be using (federal and state litigation)?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:02 am
Posts: 418
NoleinNY wrote:
thrillhouse wrote:
Westlaw next is crazy expensive. Westlaw is telling law schools they have to teach it because all the firms are using AND telling firms they have to subscribe because that's what law students (future associates) are learning. This little two-step is now out in the open and both schools and firms are unhappy about it. Plus, firms are realizing it is only marginally more useful than Google, but is much more expensive.


On the plus side, students get free pizza and backpacks if they go to training sessions.


What? We didn't get any free anything from Westlaw from the Next training session. Lexis gave us a nice water bottle for its Advance training.
I still use Westlaw Next, though. I only use Lexis when I need to generate a Table of Authorities for appellate brief. That was a nice feature that they've added.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:51 am
Posts: 34
jkay wrote:
I had dinner last night with a friend who is a partner at a ~15 attorney firm in a small, not even close to secondary market, and they are using it. FWIW.

what else did you guys talk about


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Posts: 11477
reasonable_man wrote:
So I just negotiated a new deal for my firm for Westlaw Next. We got a great deal on it (we were coming back to Westlaw from Lexis). Anyone using it? Any cool features I should be using (federal and state litigation)?



You'll really like the folders option, where you can make a folder for each case you're working on, and save the things you've looked up within that folder. You can also highlight and annotate cases as you read them on Next, and those will be saved with the case.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 11:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 2:47 pm
Posts: 289
vacate123 wrote:
jkay wrote:
I had dinner last night with a friend who is a partner at a ~15 attorney firm in a small, not even close to secondary market, and they are using it. FWIW.

what else did you guys talk about


Nice necro quote.

In any case, I now work at a different ~15 attorney firm in the same not even close to secondary market, and we have WL Next, too.

It's awesome...and no one has ever told me to tone down my usage, but I admit I will often use Google Scholar when I am randomly casting for ideas or trying to figure out the magic words I need to use.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 11:44 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 2020
quakeroats wrote:
thrillhouse wrote:
Westlaw next is crazy expensive. Westlaw is telling law schools they have to teach it because all the firms are using AND telling firms they have to subscribe because that's what law students (future associates) are learning. This little two-step is now out in the open and both schools and firms are unhappy about it. Plus, firms are realizing it is only marginally more useful than Google, but is much more expensive.


Could you break down just how it ends up being more expensive than old WL?

It's really not that much more expensive. Especially because if you search broadly in Westlaw Next, then any additional searches within that broad search do not cost any money. If you're looking for just a cite, then Westlaw is cheaper, but if you're actually doing legal research it really isn't that much more expensive.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 11:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:08 pm
Posts: 3
I've been clerking for a solo practitioner over the semester and he uses Westlaw Next... I'm glad he does!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Posts: 7621
reasonable_man wrote:
So I just negotiated a new deal for my firm for Westlaw Next. We got a great deal on it (we were coming back to Westlaw from Lexis). Anyone using it? Any cool features I should be using (federal and state litigation)?


Being able to highlight cases and save either clips or entire cases to folders without either printing them or paying for delivery is pretty boss. Also, the 'notes of decisions' on statutes, CPLR sections, etc. are not a new feature, but they are much easier and more intuitive to navigate now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Posts: 130366
jchoggan wrote:
Have law firms/associates been switching over to Westlaw Next very much (for those that used Westlaw)? How useful has it been? It seems like an interesting system, but I didn't want to start working with/get used to it if folks don't like it.

I work for a govt agency that uses it, though we use it in conjunction w/ Westlaw. It has significant limitations IMO that make both Westlaw and wlnext a must.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 11:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:17 am
Posts: 744
kalvano wrote:
reasonable_man wrote:
So I just negotiated a new deal for my firm for Westlaw Next. We got a great deal on it (we were coming back to Westlaw from Lexis). Anyone using it? Any cool features I should be using (federal and state litigation)?



You'll really like the folders option, where you can make a folder for each case you're working on, and save the things you've looked up within that folder. You can also highlight and annotate cases as you read them on Next, and those will be saved with the case.


The folders can also be shared with other users on your network, and even e-mailed.

Your history also indicates when you have viewed, annotated, or saved a case, which can be helpful in some circumstances (e.g., ran a search, skimmed a case you thought was not really on-point, but later realize the case was actually useful).

Start searches in the main search bar with the prompt "adv:" in order to use terms and connectors.

I haven't been printing any cases since switching over to Next; I highlight and annotate everything on-screen, and save to folders organized by matter>issue>sub-topic.

thrillhouse wrote:
quakeroats wrote:
thrillhouse wrote:
Westlaw next is crazy expensive. Westlaw is telling law schools they have to teach it because all the firms are using AND telling firms they have to subscribe because that's what law students (future associates) are learning. This little two-step is now out in the open and both schools and firms are unhappy about it. Plus, firms are realizing it is only marginally more useful than Google, but is much more expensive.


Could you break down just how it ends up being more expensive than old WL?


It's hard to know how much anything costs with Westlaw. They have a menu, but those prices are rarely if ever, actually paid. Firms negotiate their own contracts with WL.

So, unfortunately, I can't say how much more expensive it is. I can only relay what has been relayed to me by university and firm law librarians.


My firm is paying an 18% increase for Westlaw Next over Westlaw on a flat-rate plan.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:58 pm
Posts: 1389
A 3 man firm I applied to for the summer told me in the interview that they use WestlawNext. They somehow got a ridiculously good deal on it (barely a $ difference between that an old-WL.)

I love WLN for everything EXCEPT: On old WestLaw, you could choose to pinpoint print exactly what pages you want from a case (e.g., I only want to print pages 221-225 of Joe v. Blo, out of a 59 page decision and 10 page dissent.) WestlawNext? Better prepare your anus laserprinter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Westlaw Next
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 1:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:45 pm
Posts: 1636
When is Westlaw no longer going to be offered and permanently replaced by WestlawNext? I heard by 2014, but might just be speculation.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Anonymous post new topic Reply to topic Anonymous reply to topic   [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.



Princeton Review LSAT

Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     Contact     Copyright Notice

copyright 2003-2013 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBB