equal numbers of A- and B+, and nothing else
or
roughly equal distributions of A, A-, B+, B, with a B- in administrative law and an A+ in torts
which kind of 3.5 is looked upon more favorably? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 12:05 am
- lsat_fear
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:58 pm
Re: which kind of 3.5 is looked upon more favorably?
depends on what you are trying to do. if i were a biglaw employer, i probably wouldn't care-- a 3.5 is better than a 3.4 and worse than a 3.6. if i were a personal injury lawyer or a litigation defense boutique, i'd say the latter option looks better because at least you got an A+ in torts, so you'd be good at the specialty. likewise, if i were the epa, ftc, fcc, cspc, feca, etc, then i would rather you have all a-/b+ because then at least you didn't screw up administrative law, which would be the basis of what you'd be doing in those agencies.
- Corsair
- Posts: 2168
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 1981 12:25 am
- Kohinoor
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: which kind of 3.5 is looked upon more favorably?
The 4.0 kind.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login