Changes in LSAT scores of applicants Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
Paul Campos

Silver
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:44 am

Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by Paul Campos » Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:06 am

Total number of applicants with an LSAT score of 160 or higher

2010: 35,890

2017: 14,065

Total number of applicants with an LSAT score below 150

2010: 12,320

2017: 18,725

Slippin' Jimmy

Silver
Posts: 892
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by Slippin' Jimmy » Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:53 am

This probably means that smart people are realizing that law school is a bad idea in most circumstances.

rowdy

Bronze
Posts: 491
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 1:16 pm

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by rowdy » Sat Jun 24, 2017 5:11 pm

*sigh* do I have to do this?

Retake

User avatar
Platopus

Gold
Posts: 1507
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:20 pm

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by Platopus » Sat Jun 24, 2017 10:12 pm

This is good news as far as I'm concerned. Maybe others would disagree, but I don't really think the test has changed since 2010, so learning the test and cracking a 170+ should theoretically be just as "easy" now as in 2010.

User avatar
GFox345

Bronze
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 3:53 am

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by GFox345 » Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:15 pm

A shift in performance this dramatic may indicate a change in the difficulty of the test. I am skeptical that there has been any significant change in the attitudes of 0L applicants, and even if there was, it surely wouldn't justify such a dramatic shift. The vast, vast majority of both prospective and actual law students remain as they have always been: terrible at math and largely oblivious to the consequences of assuming an enormous amount of debt to go to law school.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


efficient

New
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:20 pm

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by efficient » Sun Jun 25, 2017 11:01 pm

GFox345 wrote:A shift in performance this dramatic may indicate a change in the difficulty of the test. I am skeptical that there has been any significant change in the attitudes of 0L applicants, and even if there was, it surely wouldn't justify such a dramatic shift. The vast, vast majority of both prospective and actual law students remain as they have always been: terrible at math and largely oblivious to the consequences of assuming an enormous amount of debt to go to law school.
I believe there is some data to suggest that there has been a change in the attitudes of potential applicants from top colleges during this time frame.

Applicants from top colleges are down 48% since 2010:

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog ... -2010.html

User avatar
Platopus

Gold
Posts: 1507
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:20 pm

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by Platopus » Sun Jun 25, 2017 11:27 pm

efficient wrote:
GFox345 wrote:A shift in performance this dramatic may indicate a change in the difficulty of the test. I am skeptical that there has been any significant change in the attitudes of 0L applicants, and even if there was, it surely wouldn't justify such a dramatic shift. The vast, vast majority of both prospective and actual law students remain as they have always been: terrible at math and largely oblivious to the consequences of assuming an enormous amount of debt to go to law school.
I believe there is some data to suggest that there has been a change in the attitudes of potential applicants from top colleges during this time frame.

Applicants from top colleges are down 48% since 2010:

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog ... -2010.html
Top college doesn't necessarily mean top LSAT score though. I'm sure the correlation is high, but I don't think it entirely explains this data.

I am skeptical that the test has actually become more difficult. We're dealing with raw numbers, and law school apps have definitely decreased, so the actual % change in top scorers may not be as pronounced, making it more plausible that a slight fluctuation in top scores may actually be the result of self selection among otherwise high scorers.

efficient

New
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:20 pm

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by efficient » Sun Jun 25, 2017 11:49 pm


User avatar
Platopus

Gold
Posts: 1507
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:20 pm

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by Platopus » Sun Jun 25, 2017 11:54 pm

Good to know, thanks

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
bmathers

Silver
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 2:27 pm

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by bmathers » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:17 am

All I know is that my LSAT may not have even gotten me into my target schools in 2010, now it got me a full+stipend. I'm a fan of this drop :-)

gwillygecko

Bronze
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by gwillygecko » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:36 am

Platopus wrote:This is good news as far as I'm concerned. Maybe others would disagree, but I don't really think the test has changed since 2010, so learning the test and cracking a 170+ should theoretically be just as "easy" now as in 2010.
totally anecdotal, but i took the lsat in both 2009 and 2016, and i feel like it was harder in 2016. i also agree that theres evidence that many potential "top applicants" are not going into law.

User avatar
Deserving Porcupine

New
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2017 10:46 am

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by Deserving Porcupine » Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:09 am

This is obviously a structural change to the test. I think the idea that somehow all the smart people just stopped taking the LSAT is a bit ludicrous, and just lol at the idea of a 'top school' being a reliable proxy for the intelligence of an applicant.

mrtux45

Bronze
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:08 am

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by mrtux45 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 9:19 am

This is obviously a personal opinion, but when I was prepping for the LSAT I found that my practice scores dropped by a few points when taking the most recent tests. I felt like logic games became less formulaic and the LR had fewer of those questions you can get in like 20 seconds.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Future Ex-Engineer

Silver
Posts: 1430
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by Future Ex-Engineer » Wed Jun 28, 2017 9:29 am

Confirmed: People are dumber in 2017 than 2010

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Wed Jun 28, 2017 9:32 am

Deserving Porcupine wrote:This is obviously a structural change to the test. I think the idea that somehow all the smart people just stopped taking the LSAT is a bit ludicrous, and just lol at the idea of a 'top school' being a reliable proxy for the intelligence of an applicant.
I don't think this is necessarily true. There's been a lot of media attention to the problems with law schools, and as the recession has receded, people with top qualifications have more options. The overall numbers are down; in 2010 you had the recession effect sending more people to grad school than you do today.

carsondalywashere

Silver
Posts: 657
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 7:33 pm

Re: Changes in LSAT scores of applicants

Post by carsondalywashere » Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:37 am

A. Nony Mouse wrote:
Deserving Porcupine wrote:This is obviously a structural change to the test. I think the idea that somehow all the smart people just stopped taking the LSAT is a bit ludicrous, and just lol at the idea of a 'top school' being a reliable proxy for the intelligence of an applicant.
I don't think this is necessarily true. There's been a lot of media attention to the problems with law schools, and as the recession has receded, people with top qualifications have more options. The overall numbers are down; in 2010 you had the recession effect sending more people to grad school than you do today.
As most things in life are, it's probably a mix of both factors.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”