UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state) Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
libby

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:10 pm

UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by libby » Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:25 pm

LSAT: 163 (maxed out)
GPA: 3.89

Hoping to get into big-law for a few years straight out of graduation. If i strike-out, I wouldn't be completely over the idea of LRAP/public interest considering I work for legal aid now. Difference in cost of attendance would be about 90k (not considering interest). Grew up in Texas and went to UT for undergrad, so I'm starving for a new experience. Any thoughts?

User avatar
dietcoke1

Silver
Posts: 1326
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by dietcoke1 » Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:30 pm

you have no other options?

User avatar
StylinNProfilin

Bronze
Posts: 410
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by StylinNProfilin » Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:01 pm

Wanting to do biglaw in Texas?

Justtrying2help

Bronze
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 3:57 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by Justtrying2help » Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:16 pm

This looks like a Texas or don't go situation. UVA would set you back like 300k after interest compounds. You don't seem absolutely sold on 10 consecutive years of LRAP (if it isn't repealed or retooled in that time).Texas is reasonable if you can get biglaw. UVA would only make logical sense if you have transformative wealth.

User avatar
PrezRand

Gold
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by PrezRand » Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:42 pm

Texas at 200k is hard to justify imo and UVA is indefensible imo

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by ponderingmeerkat » Thu Mar 16, 2017 8:25 am

Justtrying2help wrote: UVA would only make logical sense if you have transformative wealth.
And, to be completely honest, transformative wealth doesn't stay transformative if you blow 300K for a UVA JD.

User avatar
cavalier1138

Moderator
Posts: 8007
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by cavalier1138 » Thu Mar 16, 2017 8:29 am

Yeah, my choice here would be neither. You didn't apply to any schools that gave you scholarships?

libby

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:10 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by libby » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:17 pm

dietcoke1 wrote:you have no other options?
I got $$ from a few T20s but I'm set on UT or UVA

libby

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:10 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by libby » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:18 pm

PrezRand wrote:Texas at 200k is hard to justify imo and UVA is indefensible imo
Texas would probably be 150k, if that makes a difference

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


libby

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:10 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by libby » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:36 pm

StylinNProfilin wrote:Wanting to do biglaw in Texas?
Ideally yes, but I'd also like to have the option of doing big-law in DC, and I don't think Texas would necessarily give me a good set-up for that

User avatar
PrezRand

Gold
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by PrezRand » Tue Mar 21, 2017 3:04 pm

libby wrote:
PrezRand wrote:Texas at 200k is hard to justify imo and UVA is indefensible imo
Texas would probably be 150k, if that makes a difference
I think most people here would tell you that Texas at 150k is still kinda bad since you only have a 42% chance at BL.

libby

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:10 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by libby » Tue Mar 21, 2017 3:15 pm

PrezRand wrote:
libby wrote:
PrezRand wrote:Texas at 200k is hard to justify imo and UVA is indefensible imo
Texas would probably be 150k, if that makes a difference
I think most people here would tell you that Texas at 150k is still kinda bad since you only have a 42% chance at BL.
Isn't that better than any other T15-T20?

User avatar
trebekismyhero

Silver
Posts: 1095
Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 5:26 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by trebekismyhero » Tue Mar 21, 2017 3:25 pm

libby wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
libby wrote:
PrezRand wrote:Texas at 200k is hard to justify imo and UVA is indefensible imo
Texas would probably be 150k, if that makes a difference
I think most people here would tell you that Texas at 150k is still kinda bad since you only have a 42% chance at BL.
Isn't that better than any other T15-T20?
Yes, but that means if you are not one of the 42%, you'll likely be making less than $70k. Which is hard to pay back $150k plus interest

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
poptart123

Silver
Posts: 1157
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:31 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by poptart123 » Tue Mar 21, 2017 3:28 pm

You should be getting full/significant money from UHLC/SMU/Baylor. Are those options--depending on career goals of course. Have you tried to leverage them with UT? This assuming you want to work in Texas.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by BigZuck » Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:01 pm

Neither option is justifiable. Sit out a couple more years and retake again, or find better options.

Why do you want to do big law?

libby

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:10 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by libby » Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:05 pm

poptart123 wrote:You should be getting full/significant money from UHLC/SMU/Baylor. Are those options--depending on career goals of course. Have you tried to leverage them with UT? This assuming you want to work in Texas.
Tbh, if I'm going to stay in Texas, I'd like to attend UT. I'd be paying a little less if I went to BU or GWU (they gave me about 1/3 $$). But I've already ruled those schools out for the most part. I'm down to UT and UVA even if it will be more $.

User avatar
PrezRand

Gold
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by PrezRand » Tue Mar 21, 2017 8:48 pm

trebekismyhero wrote:
libby wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
libby wrote:
PrezRand wrote:Texas at 200k is hard to justify imo and UVA is indefensible imo
Texas would probably be 150k, if that makes a difference
I think most people here would tell you that Texas at 150k is still kinda bad since you only have a 42% chance at BL.
Isn't that better than any other T15-T20?
Yes, but that means if you are not one of the 42%, you'll likely be making less than $70k. Which is hard to pay back $150k plus interest
That's not true. Only like 10% get small law.
libby wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
libby wrote:
PrezRand wrote:Texas at 200k is hard to justify imo and UVA is indefensible imo
Texas would probably be 150k, if that makes a difference
I think most people here would tell you that Texas at 150k is still kinda bad since you only have a 42% chance at BL.
Isn't that better than any other T15-T20?
I mean I guess but that doesn't really help you.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
trebekismyhero

Silver
Posts: 1095
Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 5:26 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by trebekismyhero » Tue Mar 21, 2017 8:57 pm

PrezRand wrote:
trebekismyhero wrote:
libby wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
libby wrote:
PrezRand wrote:Texas at 200k is hard to justify imo and UVA is indefensible imo
Texas would probably be 150k, if that makes a difference
I think most people here would tell you that Texas at 150k is still kinda bad since you only have a 42% chance at BL.
Isn't that better than any other T15-T20?
Yes, but that means if you are not one of the 42%, you'll likely be making less than $70k. Which is hard to pay back $150k plus interest
That's not true. Only like 10% get small law.[/quote]

I really doubt the majority of those that aren't in big law are in mid-law making 100k since that is what the median for the whole law school is.

albanach

Gold
Posts: 1986
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:05 pm

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by albanach » Wed Mar 22, 2017 11:05 am

trebekismyhero wrote:
I really doubt the majority of those that aren't in big law are in mid-law making 100k since that is what the median for the whole law school is.
Whereas with UVA there's a 70% chance of biglaw or federal clerkship probably leading to biglaw. A decent number of the remaining 30% are in biggov or self-selected into public service.

Is $300k servicable on biglaw, biggov (in case pslf goes away) or midlaw is the question? A lot of that will depend on OPs goals and lifestyle.

whysooseriousbiglaw

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:44 am

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by whysooseriousbiglaw » Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:30 pm

albanach wrote:
trebekismyhero wrote:
I really doubt the majority of those that aren't in big law are in mid-law making 100k since that is what the median for the whole law school is.
Whereas with UVA there's a 70% chance of biglaw or federal clerkship probably leading to biglaw. A decent number of the remaining 30% are in biggov or self-selected into public service.

Is $300k servicable on biglaw, biggov (in case pslf goes away) or midlaw is the question? A lot of that will depend on OPs goals and lifestyle.
It may be barely serviceable, but you're basically living paycheck to paycheck for years just to pay down the loan in biglaw. Good luck with that.

User avatar
SeewhathappensLarry

Bronze
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:25 am

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by SeewhathappensLarry » Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:43 pm

whysooseriousbiglaw wrote:
albanach wrote:
trebekismyhero wrote:
I really doubt the majority of those that aren't in big law are in mid-law making 100k since that is what the median for the whole law school is.
Whereas with UVA there's a 70% chance of biglaw or federal clerkship probably leading to biglaw. A decent number of the remaining 30% are in biggov or self-selected into public service.

Is $300k servicable on biglaw, biggov (in case pslf goes away) or midlaw is the question? A lot of that will depend on OPs goals and lifestyle.
It may be barely serviceable, but you're basically living paycheck to paycheck for years just to pay down the loan in biglaw. Good luck with that.

If you do PAYE you don't have to live paycheck to paycheck. Of course, you'll end up paying possibly significantly more if you go on the longer-term plan but people do that.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


whysooseriousbiglaw

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:44 am

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by whysooseriousbiglaw » Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:47 pm

SeewhathappensLarry wrote:
whysooseriousbiglaw wrote:
albanach wrote:
trebekismyhero wrote:
I really doubt the majority of those that aren't in big law are in mid-law making 100k since that is what the median for the whole law school is.
Whereas with UVA there's a 70% chance of biglaw or federal clerkship probably leading to biglaw. A decent number of the remaining 30% are in biggov or self-selected into public service.

Is $300k servicable on biglaw, biggov (in case pslf goes away) or midlaw is the question? A lot of that will depend on OPs goals and lifestyle.
It may be barely serviceable, but you're basically living paycheck to paycheck for years just to pay down the loan in biglaw. Good luck with that.

If you do PAYE you don't have to live paycheck to paycheck. Of course, you'll end up paying possibly significantly more if you go on the longer-term plan but people do that.
Wouldn't the tax bomb be insane?

User avatar
SeewhathappensLarry

Bronze
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:25 am

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by SeewhathappensLarry » Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:49 pm

whysooseriousbiglaw wrote:
SeewhathappensLarry wrote:
whysooseriousbiglaw wrote:
albanach wrote:
trebekismyhero wrote:
I really doubt the majority of those that aren't in big law are in mid-law making 100k since that is what the median for the whole law school is.
Whereas with UVA there's a 70% chance of biglaw or federal clerkship probably leading to biglaw. A decent number of the remaining 30% are in biggov or self-selected into public service.

Is $300k servicable on biglaw, biggov (in case pslf goes away) or midlaw is the question? A lot of that will depend on OPs goals and lifestyle.
It may be barely serviceable, but you're basically living paycheck to paycheck for years just to pay down the loan in biglaw. Good luck with that.

If you do PAYE you don't have to live paycheck to paycheck. Of course, you'll end up paying possibly significantly more if you go on the longer-term plan but people do that.
Wouldn't the tax bomb be insane?
Yeah I'm sure it would be enormous. Like I said, you'd be paying significantly more in the long run. But I'm pretty sure I would prefer to not live like a pauper for almost a decade and just pay more in the long run. All depends on your risk averseness.

whysooseriousbiglaw

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:44 am

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by whysooseriousbiglaw » Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:53 pm

SeewhathappensLarry wrote:
whysooseriousbiglaw wrote:
SeewhathappensLarry wrote:
whysooseriousbiglaw wrote:
albanach wrote:
trebekismyhero wrote:
I really doubt the majority of those that aren't in big law are in mid-law making 100k since that is what the median for the whole law school is.
Whereas with UVA there's a 70% chance of biglaw or federal clerkship probably leading to biglaw. A decent number of the remaining 30% are in biggov or self-selected into public service.

Is $300k servicable on biglaw, biggov (in case pslf goes away) or midlaw is the question? A lot of that will depend on OPs goals and lifestyle.
It may be barely serviceable, but you're basically living paycheck to paycheck for years just to pay down the loan in biglaw. Good luck with that.

If you do PAYE you don't have to live paycheck to paycheck. Of course, you'll end up paying possibly significantly more if you go on the longer-term plan but people do that.
Wouldn't the tax bomb be insane?
Yeah I'm sure it would be enormous. Like I said, you'd be paying significantly more in the long run. But I'm pretty sure I would prefer to not live like a pauper for almost a decade and just pay more in the long run. All depends on your risk averseness.

I guess, but you'd have to save up for the tax bomb too....

User avatar
SeewhathappensLarry

Bronze
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:25 am

Re: UVA (sticker) v. Texas (sticker/in-state)

Post by SeewhathappensLarry » Wed Mar 22, 2017 2:05 pm

whysooseriousbiglaw wrote:
SeewhathappensLarry wrote:
whysooseriousbiglaw wrote:
SeewhathappensLarry wrote:
whysooseriousbiglaw wrote:
albanach wrote:
trebekismyhero wrote:
I really doubt the majority of those that aren't in big law are in mid-law making 100k since that is what the median for the whole law school is.
Whereas with UVA there's a 70% chance of biglaw or federal clerkship probably leading to biglaw. A decent number of the remaining 30% are in biggov or self-selected into public service.

Is $300k servicable on biglaw, biggov (in case pslf goes away) or midlaw is the question? A lot of that will depend on OPs goals and lifestyle.
It may be barely serviceable, but you're basically living paycheck to paycheck for years just to pay down the loan in biglaw. Good luck with that.

If you do PAYE you don't have to live paycheck to paycheck. Of course, you'll end up paying possibly significantly more if you go on the longer-term plan but people do that.
Wouldn't the tax bomb be insane?
Yeah I'm sure it would be enormous. Like I said, you'd be paying significantly more in the long run. But I'm pretty sure I would prefer to not live like a pauper for almost a decade and just pay more in the long run. All depends on your risk averseness.

I guess, but you'd have to save up for the tax bomb too....
I'm not saying it's ideal. Given OP's options I would wait a couple years and retake. But otherwise I would do PAYE

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”