Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School: #TrustTheProcess Forum
-
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2015 6:02 pm
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 1:18 am
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Michigan HAS cut its class size though. Last year's employment stats were for 390 graduates, this year's are for 350. Last year's 1L class had 267 students. These numbers are all we have to judge Michigan on now, but I would expect their numbers to continue to improve as smaller and smaller classes begin to graduate.Biglaw1990 wrote:Well, if Penn cut its class by 50-60 people, it would probably place close to 100% (as would other top feeder schools). A feeder school should be able to place well regardless of size.Tiddlywinks wrote:Keep classes around 290-300 and you're looking at 70%~ which is in line with the rest of the T14.
- jnwa
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:35 am
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Penn is already 100ish students smaller according to this data. By the most recent entering class theyll be 29 students smaller, makes a diff. I dont mind the Mich numbers though 8 point jump from last year is solid. Hopefully it keeps getting better with the shrinking size.Biglaw1990 wrote:Well, if Penn cut its class by 50-60 people, it would probably place close to 100% (as would other top feeder schools). A feeder school should be able to place well regardless of size.Tiddlywinks wrote:Keep classes around 290-300 and you're looking at 70%~ which is in line with the rest of the T14.
-
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2015 6:02 pm
- bruceaquizzer1
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:58 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
W&L 77% JD required job
90.22 % employed
90.22 % employed
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2015 2:48 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Michigan placed more people into BL/FC then Cornell has students. They're doing fine lol.. But yes to the above.Biglaw1990 wrote:With an increase of 170+ test-takers, T14 enrollment might increase. We'll find out soon enough.WaitersIsland wrote:Michigan HAS cut its class size though. Last year's employment stats were for 390 graduates, this year's are for 350. Last year's 1L class had 267 students. These numbers are all we have to judge Michigan on now, but I would expect their numbers to continue to improve as smaller and smaller classes begin to graduate.Biglaw1990 wrote:Well, if Penn cut its class by 50-60 people, it would probably place close to 100% (as would other top feeder schools). A feeder school should be able to place well regardless of size.Tiddlywinks wrote:Keep classes around 290-300 and you're looking at 70%~ which is in line with the rest of the T14.
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:10 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
This is a pretty dumb point to make. Did you think about this before you made it?Tiddlywinks wrote: Michigan placed more people into BL/FC then Cornell has students. They're doing fine lol.. But yes to the above.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:06 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Indiana- 18.7%
W&M- 25.3%
W&M- 25.3%
- Leonardo DiCaprio
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:06 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
lol. Michigan is done here.WaitersIsland wrote:Looks like Michigan's 100+ Firm + FC is 61%. LTBPR sitting at 85%.
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2015 2:48 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
I guess it came out wrong. My point is that most schools with small classes, such as Cornell and Penn, are able to have higher %s due to that factor alone. Way less people to fit into a set number of spots a year. The class that just started has 80 less students then the this one just reported on which will help their numbers tremendously.stretchedtoothin wrote:This is a pretty dumb point to make. Did you think about this before you made it?Tiddlywinks wrote: Michigan placed more people into BL/FC then Cornell has students. They're doing fine lol.. But yes to the above.
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:10 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Duke, NYU, Northwestern, Columbia, UVA...Tiddlywinks wrote:I guess it came out wrong. My point is that most schools with small classes, such as Cornell and Penn, are able to have higher %s due to that factor alone. Way less people to fit into a set number of spots a year. The class that just started has 80 less students then the this one just reported on which will help their numbers tremendously.stretchedtoothin wrote:This is a pretty dumb point to make. Did you think about this before you made it?Tiddlywinks wrote: Michigan placed more people into BL/FC then Cornell has students. They're doing fine lol.. But yes to the above.
all schools with comparable or much larger class sizes than UM, and all do much better with their placement #s, even accounting for PI-self selection.
- mathis1490
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 1:01 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Guys, GULC placed more people into BL/FC than Stanford has students. They are doing fine lolololTiddlywinks wrote:I guess it came out wrong. My point is that most schools with small classes, such as Cornell and Penn, are able to have higher %s due to that factor alone. Way less people to fit into a set number of spots a year. The class that just started has 80 less students then the this one just reported on which will help their numbers tremendously.stretchedtoothin wrote:This is a pretty dumb point to make. Did you think about this before you made it?Tiddlywinks wrote: Michigan placed more people into BL/FC then Cornell has students. They're doing fine lol.. But yes to the above.
- jnwa
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:35 am
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
lmao Duke has like 130 less students NW has 90 less. UVA is fair NYU and Columbia are better schools.stretchedtoothin wrote:Duke, NYU, Northwestern, Columbia, UVA...Tiddlywinks wrote:I guess it came out wrong. My point is that most schools with small classes, such as Cornell and Penn, are able to have higher %s due to that factor alone. Way less people to fit into a set number of spots a year. The class that just started has 80 less students then the this one just reported on which will help their numbers tremendously.stretchedtoothin wrote:This is a pretty dumb point to make. Did you think about this before you made it?Tiddlywinks wrote: Michigan placed more people into BL/FC then Cornell has students. They're doing fine lol.. But yes to the above.
all schools with comparable or much larger class sizes than UM, and all do much better with their placement #s, even accounting for PI-self selection.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- usernotfound
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 12:46 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
But how do you know which numbers arise out of self-selection? UM probably has the most PI gunners in the T14, plus the numbers likely indicate 6%+ SSC clerkships that aren't counted in the BL+FC metric.stretchedtoothin wrote:Duke, NYU, Northwestern, Columbia, UVA...Tiddlywinks wrote:I guess it came out wrong. My point is that most schools with small classes, such as Cornell and Penn, are able to have higher %s due to that factor alone. Way less people to fit into a set number of spots a year. The class that just started has 80 less students then the this one just reported on which will help their numbers tremendously.stretchedtoothin wrote:This is a pretty dumb point to make. Did you think about this before you made it?Tiddlywinks wrote: Michigan placed more people into BL/FC then Cornell has students. They're doing fine lol.. But yes to the above.
all schools with comparable or much larger class sizes than UM, and all do much better with their placement #s, even accounting for PI-self selection.
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:10 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
I'm disinclined to think that UM has more honest-to-god PI gunners than NYU/Berkeley, and it's still unclear whether UM's reputation for PI self-selection (and placement #s) come from those honestly entering LS to do PI in the first place or whether that's a product of TLS explaining away the Michigan numbers when they started dropping. I digress though.
I think the majority of people on TLS aren't entering T14 law schools with the intent of doing PI fresh out of law school, so for many people, the BL+FC #s are important. It's weird to just say "oh yeah it's because of class size" because although it may be true, that doesn't really help any of the students who may have struck out in OCI 2014
I think the majority of people on TLS aren't entering T14 law schools with the intent of doing PI fresh out of law school, so for many people, the BL+FC #s are important. It's weird to just say "oh yeah it's because of class size" because although it may be true, that doesn't really help any of the students who may have struck out in OCI 2014
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 7:47 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Well, in the interest of truth, RE self selection-stretchedtoothin wrote:Duke, NYU, Northwestern, Columbia, UVA...Tiddlywinks wrote:I guess it came out wrong. My point is that most schools with small classes, such as Cornell and Penn, are able to have higher %s due to that factor alone. Way less people to fit into a set number of spots a year. The class that just started has 80 less students then the this one just reported on which will help their numbers tremendously.stretchedtoothin wrote:This is a pretty dumb point to make. Did you think about this before you made it?Tiddlywinks wrote: Michigan placed more people into BL/FC then Cornell has students. They're doing fine lol.. But yes to the above.
all schools with comparable or much larger class sizes than UM, and all do much better with their placement #s, even accounting for PI-self selection.
Michigan: 19.7% PI/Gov
NYU: 16.9% PI/Gov (2014 data)
Virginia: 12.4% PI/Gov
Columbia: 12% PI/Gov (2014 data)
NW: 9.3% PI/Gov (2014 data)
Penn: 8.7% PI/Gov
Duke: 5.4% PI/Gov
I'd argue that explains some of the discrepancy WRT Michigan's BL/Fed metric versus employment overall. But I wouldnt argue that Michigan is on the same tier as CCN, or anything.
- Leonardo DiCaprio
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:06 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
oh I was waiting for the "bu...bu...but PI! self-selection!" trope.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 7:47 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
nah, just numbers.Leonardo DiCaprio wrote:oh I was waiting for the "bu...bu...but PI! self-selection!" trope.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 12:43 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Looking at aggregate numbers isn't crazy. Firms come in hoping to bring in 'x' number of people.
Mich
BL + FC # / total students
2012 - 201 / 388
2013 - 228 / 399
2014 - 210 / 390
2015 - 216 / 354
2016 - ? / 330ish
If history repeats itself, they will be ~63%-66% next year.
By the time the 267 + 20ish transfers 2018 class hits. Assuming firms and Mich maintain this consistency, they would be at like ~71% - 76%
Mich
BL + FC # / total students
2012 - 201 / 388
2013 - 228 / 399
2014 - 210 / 390
2015 - 216 / 354
2016 - ? / 330ish
If history repeats itself, they will be ~63%-66% next year.
By the time the 267 + 20ish transfers 2018 class hits. Assuming firms and Mich maintain this consistency, they would be at like ~71% - 76%
- Iwanttolawschool
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Strongly disagree as a Michigan student. It seems every 1L comes in saying they want only public interest here. Then many are swayed by time OCI rolls around.stretchedtoothin wrote:I'm disinclined to think that UM has more honest-to-god PI gunners than NYU/Berkeley, and it's still unclear whether UM's reputation for PI self-selection (and placement #s) come from those honestly entering LS to do PI in the first place or whether that's a product of TLS explaining away the Michigan numbers when they started dropping. I digress though.
I think the majority of people on TLS aren't entering T14 law schools with the intent of doing PI fresh out of law school, so for many people, the BL+FC #s are important. It's weird to just say "oh yeah it's because of class size" because although it may be true, that doesn't really help any of the students who may have struck out in OCI 2014
Last edited by Iwanttolawschool on Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
- lymenheimer
- Posts: 3979
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:54 am
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
So what you're saying is that Michigan will cut all of it's prospective PI applicants...?Fiddlesticks wrote:Looking at aggregate numbers isn't crazy. Firms come in hoping to bring in 'x' number of people.
Mich
BL + FC # / total students
2012 - 201 / 388
2013 - 228 / 399
2014 - 210 / 390
2015 - 216 / 354
2016 - ? / 330ish
If history repeats itself, they will be ~63%-66% next year.
By the time the 267 + 20ish transfers 2018 class hits. Assuming firms and Mich maintain this consistency, they would be at like ~71% - 76%
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 12:43 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
No no. It's not like 100% of people who want BL or FC get it, and no one said that. There are lots of PI or bust people, I'm sure. But, there are also some people who still strike out, not just at Mich - at all t14. So if firms keep taking around 210 kids from Mich, they will have to dip into the lower grades and/or awkward people.lymenheimer wrote:So what you're saying is that Michigan will cut all of it's prospective PI applicants...?Fiddlesticks wrote:Looking at aggregate numbers isn't crazy. Firms come in hoping to bring in 'x' number of people.
Mich
BL + FC # / total students
2012 - 201 / 388
2013 - 228 / 399
2014 - 210 / 390
2015 - 216 / 354
2016 - ? / 330ish
If history repeats itself, they will be ~63%-66% next year.
By the time the 267 + 20ish transfers 2018 class hits. Assuming firms and Mich maintain this consistency, they would be at like ~71% - 76%
- BVest
- Posts: 7887
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:51 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
[tagging]
Last edited by BVest on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:19 pm
- KissMyAxe
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:01 pm
Re: Class of 2015 Employment Statistics by School
Where the hell did you get this? I don't know about TLS students' goals, but you can't apply TLS', a very small subsection of the law school body, goals to the rest of the students. At YLS at least, pretty much everyone comes in saying they want PI, and Biglaw gunners are pretty much looked down on and viewed as selling out.stretchedtoothin wrote:I'm disinclined to think that UM has more honest-to-god PI gunners than NYU/Berkeley, and it's still unclear whether UM's reputation for PI self-selection (and placement #s) come from those honestly entering LS to do PI in the first place or whether that's a product of TLS explaining away the Michigan numbers when they started dropping. I digress though.
I think the majority of people on TLS aren't entering T14 law schools with the intent of doing PI fresh out of law school, so for many people, the BL+FC #s are important. It's weird to just say "oh yeah it's because of class size" because although it may be true, that doesn't really help any of the students who may have struck out in OCI 2014
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login